Hi all. Things have ben pretty dead around here of late, mainly because for two months I’ve had the Never-Get-Over cold that’s been going around. I’m slowly getting better, and I’m talking to a few people about contributing to the site. If you’re interested in writing for Healdsburgers, please email me.
Heads up!
February 11th, 2008 · Saggio Hills
From friend of the blog, Hank Skewis: Tomorrow night (Feb. 12th) is a public hearing on the revised development agreement between Saggio Hills and the city. If you have something to say, this is as good a place to say it as any. City Hall, 7 PM.
→ 1 CommentTags:
The hiatus will end soon. But not quite yet.
January 14th, 2008 · Uncategorized
What with the holidays and a flurry of work, things have been kind of slow around here. We expect the pace to pick up, as we all get back in the swing of things. More from us soon!
In the meantime, we want to hear from you. Healdsburgers is about all of us, not just the few of us who have contributed so far. If you’re interested in posting on Healdsburgers, just drop me a line with your post, and I’ll put it up. Please be aware that I’m out of town this week on business, so I may not be able to give as timely a reply as I usually would.
As I said in a previous post, I’m not comfortable in making Healdsburgers an anti-Saggio Hills site; there are other sites for that (look at the right sidebar for one). I’d like this place to be one where both sides of an issue are aired.
→ No CommentsTags:
A cautionary note on Saggio Hills
December 17th, 2007 · Saggio Hills
[A somewhat longer version of this message was sent to me for posting on Healdsburgers. It's my intention that Healdsburgers become a blog celebrating many aspects of Healdsburg community life. That said, I don't want this to become a single-issue blog, and certainly not one expressing only one point of view regarding the Saggio Hills project.
In this post, Richard Burg expresses his opinion about the project. His opinions are his own, and posting it here does not imply endorsement. In the spirit of an open exchange of views, I welcome posts expressing a different perspective. I reserve the right to edit submitted posts for clarity and length. -- Tom Negrino]
By Richard Burg
There is enormous momentum for development on this parcel. One reason I believe a healthier alternative is to increase downtown density, is that doing SH now, will contribute to the evolution of Healdsburg Avenue from March Avenue out to the City line. There will be subtle economic pressure to develop commercial activity along there, robbing the downtown of transactions! It wouldn’t happen overnight, but it will be a contributing factor to “sprawl.”
The truth is, the City is under no obligation to annex this land. It might be embarrassing for city staff face the developer; yes, the city might never again get such a high end proposal; and yes, Healdsburg Avenue might turn into Santa Rosa Avenue anyway. I am not convinced our City has managed long term planning in the most progressive manner. Healdsburg has been very lucky! The combination of wine, food, and good marketing. And, to give them some credit, the City hasn’t killed the golden goose either! Yet. Saggio Hills might be the first new restaurant location since the hookup fees were increased to pay for the new water treatment plant.
Saggio Hills appears to be an appealing project from many perspectives – size, siting, design, potential revenue, gifts to the city.
But I don’t think it will be good for Healdsburg. If you visit high end destination resorts next to or in small cities, they suffer the ebb and flow of transients; they transform in response to the particular economics of tourism. Half Moon Bay has a Ritz Carleton and an ocean; Aspen has skiing; Jackson Hole, WY, has the Tetons, Yellowstone, and snow; Carmel has the ocean. We have wine. (And maybe gambling!) Imagining what the 500 visitors to a conference up there will do or buy in downtown isn’t a compelling vision for a sustainable city with the values and qualities that are so appealing now.
It would generate significant TOT revenue. If half the 70 residences are available for transient occupancy, with 3 or 4 bedrooms each, plus the 130 ”keys” in the resort (each of which will have a minimum of 2 beds), Saggio Hills will, at a minimum, double the number of beds available for visitors. We’ll need to make reservations at our favorite restaurant a year in advance! So scale is an issue.
Perhaps it is idealistic and naive to think Healdsburg could be a model city that can plan to survive no grapes, less water, no fuel – with more local industry (small), more locally produced food, more walkable neighborhoods that provide living and working opportunities. If we don’t make a case for it today, we will become more dependent on wine and tourists – both risky in most of the 10-20 year projections for carbon fuels, agriculture, and climate.
→ No CommentsTags:
Planning Commission Approves Saggio Hills Area Plan
November 29th, 2007 · Healdsburg, Saggio Hills
During the meeting on Monday, 11/27, the Healdsburg Planning Commissioners approved the Area Plan for Saggio Hills, which incorporated their staff’s comments. During the time set aside for public comments, about a dozen people spoke with concerns about water, schools, agriculture, fire risk, sightlines and the visibility of some of the proposed new homes, wetlands and wildlife, visual and sound impact on Parkland Farms residents, and the number of people who will be using the proposed convention facility. I was impressed by the thoughtfulness and reasonableness of the public comments. Planning and Building Director Rick Tooker addressed many of the concerns, also in a thoughtful and reasonable way.
The approval process is highly technical, with certain comments being allowed to be considered only at certain stages; it is difficult for the average citizen to know when the right time is to be heard. The commissioners gave a great deal of leeway in allowing comments that would have better been delivered at an earlier stage of the project.
Next Tuesday, 12/4, a Special Meeting will be held to continue discussions about the Tentative Map. Following that, a Public Hearing will be held on 12/11 regarding the Development Agreement. This is where we will get a complete picture of what Healdsburg will receive for allowing this valuable, pristine property to be annexed for the Saggio Hills development. Then, the City Council will decide, once advised by the Planning Commission, on the various entitlements that will allow the project to go forward.
Fasten your seat belts.
Saggio Hills development agreement posted
November 28th, 2007 · Saggio Hills
One of the bits of news from last night’s Planning Commission meeting (we hope to have a recap post up soon) was that the Draft Development Agreement between the City and Sonoma Luxury Resort LLC (the developer) has now been posted, all 120 pages of it, on the city’s Web site. Like so many other things on that site, it’s a bit hard to find, so here’s a direct link (warning: 5.6 MB PDF file).
Comments OffTags: